Home › Stories › Market history

Tulip mania: the 1637 bubble, and how much of it is myth

In the winter of 1636–37, some tulip bulbs in Holland changed hands for more than a skilled worker earned in years. In early February 1637, the buyers vanished. The story has been retold for nearly 400 years, and much of what people repeat isn't quite true.

Story · 7-minute read · Updated 2026-10-21

The world before the bubble

In the early 1600s, the Dutch Republic was one of the richest places on Earth. Its ships traded across the globe. Amsterdam had one of the first modern stock markets.

Tulips had arrived in Europe from the Ottoman Empire in the 1500s. They were new, bright and unlike any other flower. Owning rare ones became a sign of taste and status.

The rarest were "broken" tulips, with flame-like streaks of colour on their petals. Nobody knew at the time what caused the streaks. Today we know it was a virus spread by tiny insects. It made the patterns impossible to plan and the bulbs slow to multiply.

Rare, beautiful and hard to copy: the perfect thing for prices to run away on.

How the trade worked

Tulip bulbs sit in the ground most of the year. So, through the winter, people traded promises: a paper note saying "I'll buy this bulb from you when it's dug up in summer, at this price".

In plain words, they were trading something like an early futures contract, often without anyone seeing the bulb.

Much of this trade happened in taverns, in groups called "colleges", with their own rules and rituals. The Dutch later called it the windhandel, the "wind trade", because no actual goods changed hands.

What happened

During late 1636 and January 1637, prices for many bulbs climbed fast. Even common varieties, sold by weight, joined the rise.

People bought notes, then resold them days later at higher prices. Few expected to plant the bulbs. They expected someone else to pay more.

The most famous variety, Semper Augustus, was so rare that, by most accounts, almost none were for sale at all. Stories of its price, often compared with a fine house in Amsterdam, come from writers of the time and later. Exact figures vary and are hard to check.

The moment everyone remembers

In the first days of February 1637, the story goes, a routine bulb sale in the city of Haarlem found no buyers at the asking prices.

Word spread quickly. Within days, buyers across the country stopped showing up. Prices for many bulbs fell sharply. Lots of people now held promises to buy bulbs at prices no one would pay.

Many refused to honour their contracts. Dutch courts generally declined to force payment, treating the deals like gambling debts. Towns and growers argued for months over how to settle up.

What historians now say

Here's the twist. The popular version, with ruined families, a national economic collapse and people throwing themselves into canals, comes mostly from a book published in 1841: Charles Mackay's Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds. Mackay relied heavily on moralising pamphlets written right after the crash.

In 2007, historian Anne Goldgar published Tulipmania, based on years in Dutch archives. She found:

• Far fewer people took part than the legend suggests. Most were merchants and craftsmen who could afford it.
• She found no clear evidence of a wider Dutch economic crisis caused by tulips.
• Many traders active in 1637 kept trading for years afterwards.

Some economists have also argued that prices were less crazy than they look, because of how contracts worked at the end. That debate is ongoing.

So was tulip mania a bubble? A sharp boom and bust in tulip prices really happened. Its size and damage were very likely smaller than the famous story.

What it teaches

1. "Someone will pay more" is not a plan

When people buy only because they expect to resell higher, prices can rise far above what the thing is worth to anyone who uses it. When new buyers stop coming, there's no floor. A written trading plan answers "why am I in, and where do I get out?" before you buy.

2. The crowd feels like proof

Seeing neighbours profit on paper made tulip notes feel safe. That pull has a modern name: FOMO. Read FOMO trading for a simple pause when a move feels urgent.

3. A contract is only as good as the other side

Many tulip buyers simply walked away. If no one makes the other side pay, a promise is just paper. Modern exchanges use clearing houses and margin for exactly this reason.

4. Check the story before you trust it

Even the world's most famous market tale turned out to be partly myth. The same goes for screenshots and "can't-lose" claims today. Read is trading gambling? for how rules separate the two.

What it doesn't mean

• It doesn't mean every rising price is "tulip mania". The phrase gets used for almost any boom. Many of those booms were nothing of the kind.
• It doesn't mean the Dutch were fools. They were among the most skilled traders of their age. Bubbles can happen to anyone.
• It isn't proof of a nationwide collapse. Modern research suggests the damage was limited to a fairly small group.
• Numbers from 1637 are rough. Treat any exact price you see quoted with care.

Timeline

Questions